A team of researchers has created a framework for comprehensively addressing the cascade of problems that emerge from adverse experiences of children from birth to age 18. These patterns of harm are consistent across continents and cultures. The more adverse experiences a child has, the greater the damage. When first researched in the early 2000s, adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) were surprisingly widespread, with two thirds of 17,000 mainly middle-class people in the United States reporting at least one. ACEs are more prevalent in disadvantaged communities where there is less income, less education, and greater social marginalization.
Based on years of research, the framework – called the Intergenerational and Cumulative Adverse and Resilient Experiences (ICARE) model – identifies 10 types of ACEs, as well as 10 protective and compensatory experiences (PACEs) that build resilience.
Emotional abuse
Sexual abuse
Physical neglect
Emotional neglect
Divorce
Domestic violence
Mental illness in the household
Criminality in the household
Substance abuse in the household
Having a best friend
Being part of a social group
Having a mentor
Volunteering
Living in a safe and clean home with enough food
Getting a good education
Having a hobby
Engaging in regular physical activity
Having family routines and consistent rules
*This is the most important protection.
The ICARE model also recommends a wide set of interventions that address the many ways ACEs can harm children’s development. At the heart of the approach is supporting the protective factors that are already in place in families and helping families become stronger.
The ICARE model shows the pathway by which ACEs can disadvantage children’s future and harm the next generation.
Prolonged activation of stress responses that are typically used in brief crisis-response situations results in biological and neurobiological changes that can become embedded in a child. The body’s immune system can be harmed, as well as the development of brain structures and functions. Epigenetic changes to DNA as a result of adversity – the methylation of certain genes that change how they function – embed the impact of ACEs, influencing how the child responds to stress later in life. Epigenetic changes are heritable, passed from mothers and fathers to their biological children.
The most significant developmental system in early childhood is attachment. Secure attachment evolves when an infant’s needs are consistently met, creating a safe and predictable place where caregivers can be trusted. Attachment also has a biological/neurobiological dimension, for example, with the action of the hormones dopamine and oxytocin. ACEs can disrupt attachment, which is associated with a wide range of behavioral, social, and emotional problems later in life.
ACEs can also damage cognitive development. Skills associated with executive function, such as working memory, inhibitory control, and focused attention, can be harmed in children who have experienced adversity. This can lead to problems with learning during education and training.
ACEs can disadvantage the next generation in two ways: Parents who have been adversely affected by ACEs in their own lives are more likely to struggle with parenting. And parents may pass to their children epigenetic changes that affect the child’s biological response to stress.
The foundation of the strategic approach proposed by the ICARE model starts with assessing and mobilizing protective factors that already exist or could exist around the child. Researchers point to successful support programs in five categories:
The authors of the framework explain that the ICARE model “suggests new opportunities to design and implement multilevel prevention and intervention programs across the various pathways by which adverse and protective experiences influence outcomes.”
The post How to protect children from the negative impacts of adverse childhood experiences – a comprehensive approach appeared first on Child and Family Blog.
Based on years of research, the framework – called the Intergenerational and Cumulative Adverse and Resilient Experiences (ICARE) model – identifies 10 types of ACEs, as well as 10 protective and compensatory experiences (PACEs) that build resilience.
| 10 Adverse Experiences | 10 Protective Experiences |
| Physical abuse | Unconditional love from caregivers * |
Emotional abuse
Sexual abuse
Physical neglect
Emotional neglect
Divorce
Domestic violence
Mental illness in the household
Criminality in the household
Substance abuse in the household
Having a best friend
Being part of a social group
Having a mentor
Volunteering
Living in a safe and clean home with enough food
Getting a good education
Having a hobby
Engaging in regular physical activity
Having family routines and consistent rules
*This is the most important protection.
The ICARE model also recommends a wide set of interventions that address the many ways ACEs can harm children’s development. At the heart of the approach is supporting the protective factors that are already in place in families and helping families become stronger.
The ICARE model shows the pathway by which ACEs can disadvantage children’s future and harm the next generation.
Neurobiological and epigenetic impacts of ACEs
Prolonged activation of stress responses that are typically used in brief crisis-response situations results in biological and neurobiological changes that can become embedded in a child. The body’s immune system can be harmed, as well as the development of brain structures and functions. Epigenetic changes to DNA as a result of adversity – the methylation of certain genes that change how they function – embed the impact of ACEs, influencing how the child responds to stress later in life. Epigenetic changes are heritable, passed from mothers and fathers to their biological children.
Developmental impacts of ACEs
The most significant developmental system in early childhood is attachment. Secure attachment evolves when an infant’s needs are consistently met, creating a safe and predictable place where caregivers can be trusted. Attachment also has a biological/neurobiological dimension, for example, with the action of the hormones dopamine and oxytocin. ACEs can disrupt attachment, which is associated with a wide range of behavioral, social, and emotional problems later in life.
ACEs can also damage cognitive development. Skills associated with executive function, such as working memory, inhibitory control, and focused attention, can be harmed in children who have experienced adversity. This can lead to problems with learning during education and training.
Intergenerational transmission
ACEs can disadvantage the next generation in two ways: Parents who have been adversely affected by ACEs in their own lives are more likely to struggle with parenting. And parents may pass to their children epigenetic changes that affect the child’s biological response to stress.
Strategies to mitigate the negative impacts of ACEs
The foundation of the strategic approach proposed by the ICARE model starts with assessing and mobilizing protective factors that already exist or could exist around the child. Researchers point to successful support programs in five categories:
- Supporting parents and caregivers with their own psychological and emotional well-being
- Supporting parents and caregivers with attachment and parenting skills
- Supporting children directly, for example, by encouraging their participation in sports, hobbies, and friendships
- Psychological therapies for children that address the past traumas
- Play-based therapeutic activities for children and parents together
The authors of the framework explain that the ICARE model “suggests new opportunities to design and implement multilevel prevention and intervention programs across the various pathways by which adverse and protective experiences influence outcomes.”
The post How to protect children from the negative impacts of adverse childhood experiences – a comprehensive approach appeared first on Child and Family Blog.