This article is copyrighted by GreenMedInfo LLC, 2021
Visit our Re-post guidelines
In a court filing, attorneys for Meta, formerly Facebook, admit that their fact check labels aren't based on facts at all -- they're actually just opinions
The "fact checks" that Facebook, now known as Meta, has used to silence and censor throughout the pandemic are actually just "opinions." The stunning admission came from Meta's own attorneys, who stated in a court filing, "The labels themselves are neither false nor defamatory; to the contrary, they constitute protected opinion."[1]
read more
Visit our Re-post guidelines
In a court filing, attorneys for Meta, formerly Facebook, admit that their fact check labels aren't based on facts at all -- they're actually just opinions
The "fact checks" that Facebook, now known as Meta, has used to silence and censor throughout the pandemic are actually just "opinions." The stunning admission came from Meta's own attorneys, who stated in a court filing, "The labels themselves are neither false nor defamatory; to the contrary, they constitute protected opinion."[1]
read more